Mastering at The Farm

Saturday, April 11th, 2009

I’ve been mastering records I’ve mixed for a number of years now.  The first record I mastered was Born On by the Portland, OR band Time Farmer.  bornonBy the time I was done mixing this one, I felt like we were so close to having the exact sound I wanted that I thought it would be worth mastering this one myself.  Everyone was happy, and to this day it’s one of my favorite sounding records I’ve worked on.  The next one I mastered was Golden Dragon by the Philly band Downtown Harvest.  Same thing here – we were very happy with the sound, so I went for it – again, another favorite.  And on I went, slowly taking up mastering on my own while carefully observing all the great mastering engineers I’ve worked with, like Jeff Lipton at Peerless Mastering in BostonNathan James at The Vault here in NYC and Nick Blagona at Metalworks in Toronto.

More recently, I have begun to take on clients for whom I am only mastering. It was only after a number of years mastering records I had mixed that I felt I was ready to take this step, as the experience has allowed me to study mastering more, gather some critical tools, and to develop a method that gets me the results that I and my clients are looking for.  At this point I’m not only happy to be offering mastering, I’m totally enjoying it! I think one of the most rewarding things about mastering is that I know we are making the final decisions about the record – this is what is going out into the world.

cutting-lathe-copy

A cutting lathe. This is why the call it "cutting a record."

In the past, mixers and mastering engineers were completely different animals.  The job of the mastering engineer was to take a tape and  transform it into a master disc from which the vinyl releases would be manufactured.  This required the use of a lathe, a specialized machine that cut the master.  It’s no wonder that mastering was its own field.  Today, however, we are more often than not going from digital files to digital files.  For better or worse, anyone with basic audio software and a disc burner can make a master.  Of course, this doesn’t mean that anyone with the capability of making a master has the capability of making a good sounding master, but it does mean that more experienced engineers can begin to take on the role of mastering using much of the gear that they already own.

So, my methods for mastering will vary according to what the project seems to require, but in general I am mastering out of Pro Tools HD, sending out to hardware with the hedd_192productCranesong HEDD 192 converter, often hitting my API 2500 compressorph1_2500_m when appropriate, and using a few key plugins within Pro Tools, including the Sonnox Inflator, the PSP Neon Linear Phase EQ and the Massey 2007 Mastering Limiter.  I’m learning that the API 2500 can be a very neutral box, with such a low ratio as 1.5:1 and ultra fast release times, just getting those needles to bob every so slightly allows the box to add a coherance and punch to mixes without imparting too much of that sound.  The HEDD’s tape and tube emulation has proven indespensible, especially when needing to add warmth and depth to crispy digital mixes.

One thing that I seem to do a bit differently is that I am really relying upon the addition of harmonics to achieve apparent loudness and excitement.  As when I mix, I try to take a layered and cascading approach to adding harmonic richness.  Getting a little bit of harmonic complexity out of each stage in the chain can result in a very lively master that doesn’t sound squashed.  And I’m entirely committed to learning how to get the masters to really come alive without being overly concerned with the so-called “loudness wars.”  I aim to get the masteres “up there” but to retain enough dynamic range that they are stll engaging and don’t tire out the ears.  For me, adding harmonic complexity seems to be the key to achieving these results.

Finally, one of the most imporant additions to my studio for mastering is the new Antelope Isochrone OCXV master clock. ocxv It’s hard to explain how key this piece of kit is to feeling as if I can truly make the best calls regarding producing a final product.  Both the ability to hear into the music in order to make the best choices about processing and the overall increased accuracy in the digital stream that becomes the masters themselves are essential to my work at this point.  It’s my humble opinion that the Antelope clocks are going to start finding their way into a majority of mastering studios.

So, there we have it: I’m officially out of the closet as a mastering engineer!

Comments

  1. Molly says:

    You are the Master of the Universe. (Love the blog)
    :)

  2. Howard Rappaport says:

    Hey Allen!

    Nice to know you’re doing this now, but you’ve GOT to get to the golden ratio of 5:4 [1.25:1]; if you like 1.5:1, you’ll LOVE 5:4!

    Also, as l learned at Sony, different clocks sound different, and these differences can be used as musical choices, the same as when considering which EQ to use…try it!

    Love,
    how

  3. admin says:

    Hey Howard, you can read about my experience comparing four different clocks here:
    http://farmelo.com/blog/?p=25
    I get into using the clocks as choices, for sure, especially between the internal clock of the HEDD and the Antelope. Very different sound stages and frequency emphasis.

    I thought the golden ratio was the irrational mathematical constant where the ratio between two summed numbers and the big number is the same as….wait, ok, I get it!

  4. Nolan Hurley says:

    Hi Allen, longtime reader, first time commented. Are you mastering in your studio with the focals, or in the big studio with the barefoots? I am also slowly expanding into mastering and have awful speaker envy.

  5. admin says:

    Hi Nolan,

    Yes, mastering in my room with the Focals. I’m finding that knowing the speakers is 99% of the battle, and that using different playback systems constantly during the work is important for me. To that end, I use Avantone Mix Cubes, my 70s Marantz 2010 hi-fi into B&W bookshelf speakers, and into Sharp boombox speakers I bought at a stoop sale. I also try out my ear buds, and use my trusty Sony MDR phones to check for clicks and pops. So, the Focals are my reference point, but I’m always trying to get the music to translate to these other systems properly, too. The B&Ws, for example, are classic stereo speakers in that they have a woofy, over inflated low end with the Marantz (very 70s), and they force me to work on tightening my low end. The Avantones focus me on my mids, and those crappy Sharp speakers make me really listen to my high end in a different way, as they’re quite harsh in the top (I learn if my opening the top end worked or not on those).

    I should mention that I do bring stuff into Mavericks to listen on the Barefoots when I can, and that experience is always thoroughly enlightening. I feel I’ve gotten to the point where I kind of know how things are going to sound on the MM27s – or at least I’ve gotten closer and closer to knowing how my masters will translate on those speakers.

    I hope this is helpful info.
    A.