Archive for April, 2009

An open letter to Digidesign…

Friday, April 17th, 2009

d_logoDear Digidesign,

I first want to go on record as someone who does not complain about Pro Tools.  I know you get a lot of grief, but I have been making my living with Pro Tools for so long that I can only say thank you for making it all possible.  I love that you are the studio standard because I can count on Pro Tools being there, wherever there is.  I also think Pro Tools is the most elegant DAW; there is a “tape machine” and a mixer, just like analog.  Easy, simply, effective and quick.

In an effort to help the evolution of Pro Tools, I am writing this to put forth my own personal wishlist, and to invite others to jump in.  I know there are a lot of forums out there where people post their wishes, but here in my own little corner I hope to keep a kind of running wishlist that my cohorts and I can ammend as we wish.  With no further ado, these are things that I would love to have appear in new versions of Pro Tools:

• Inserts on sends: Just one or two inserts on sends would be wonderfully helpful.  From something as simple as eq’ing a snare going to a reverb to something more complex, like distorting a send that’s feeding one of two parallel compression subgroups, this would be a cool feature.  I’m sure I’d use it when creating multiple cue mixes in Pro Tools, too.

• Track patch saves: The idea is to be able to name and save a set of inserts and all of the plugin settings and then be able to easily call those up from a menu and apply them to any track. For example, “Big Al’s Phat Bass” might apply an eq, a compressor, an instance of Phoenix, each with its saved presets for that track patch.  We could eventually build libraries of our favorite patches.  Maybe we could apply a track patch from our library while creating a track.  We all know the work-arounds, and they’re time consuming, demand a good memory and require that a session in which we saved a cool patch on a track is on a connected drive. Track patches would save enormous time during tracking and mixing.

• Name a track and choose color when creating it: pretty simple request, but it makes sense.  When creating more than one track, I can see the trickiness, but perhaps there’s a way.  (And don’t forget that we can chose track patches at this point, too, right?)

• Free and easy cross platform compatibility: maybe it’s just my nature, but being able to open sessions in other DAWs without paying extra just seems like a nice thing to do.

• Album mastering mode: This one is big! OK, so what if Pro Tools could enter Mastering Mode, where all the familiar Pro Tools editing functions were applicable, with the addition of adding CD track markers, PQ and ISRC data, a playlist editing window, full CD burning and DDP export functionality, master dither for whole album, a mastering shuffle mode that moved all regions and markers to the right, but left everything to the left alone.  I could go on, but I’m sure you get the idea.  I want a fully functional mastering and CD authoring program within the familiar editing territory of Pro Tools, making use of that lovely 64 bit mix engine, external clock, etc…

• Session comments: I picture this being a simple form that one fills out.  Automatic data about the dates of recording could be generated as a list, and the bit depth and sample rate and Pro Tools versions used could be logged, too.  There would be fields for the studios used, engineers, musicians, and all the necessary data.  The consistent data could easily be imported from one session to the next for an album project.  Exportable as text documents or .pdf for emailing around the world and for printing, but equally as importantly, right there to view when opening a session.

• Recording has stopped visual alarm: This would simply be an enormous flashing black and white screen when recording had, for some reason, stopped unexpectedly.  Sometimes when a disc is full, for example, PT stops, but one doesn’t know it until way too late.

• Hardware insert bypass: why doesn’t this ever work for me?  When ever I try to bypass a hardware insert, I can’t do it.  Would really like to be able to A/B my inserts.

•  “Audio.01: make it so that no audio file can be recorded with the word “audio” in its track title.  In fact, I’d go so far as to ask for an industry standard file naming protocol.  My suggestion is: SongTitle_Instrument_Take#.  I’d also like to see a dialogue box that says “Audio is an illegal file name, would you like to see a list of industry standard track names?”  Further, the song name could be automatically inserted onto each audio file, a choice in the preferences, perhaps.

• Legible track names: somehow I’d like to be able to read my track names, and unless it’s short, like “K” or Gtr,” I often have a hard time making out the truncated words, especially in narrow view mode.  There has to be a way.  Diagonal – like parking spots maybe?

• Longer delay compensation: If only to allow my 6200 sample dealyed linear phase eq to work during mixes.

• Import session data attribute saves: When importing tracks from different sessions, it would be a great time saver to be able to pick from a bunch of preconfigured import settings that we could name and save.  For example, “Empty tracks with plugins only,” or “All audio regions and plugins without automation.”  I picture this looking a lot like the group attributes saves.

• Name group attribute saves: While we’re on the topic, I’d like to be able to name my group attribute settings, rather than just using the numbers.  I can’t remember what they were, usually.  I’d use names like “All functions grouped” or “Faders free edit group,” or just “Allen’s typical group settings.”

• Import track colors: when importing session data, tracks colors don’t travel into the new session.  I wish they would.

• Markers follow bulk edits: Alex Oana explains in his comment below that one can shift-click in the marker bar when selecting audio regions, and they’ll follow the edit.  Thank you, Alex!

I hope to add to this as my hours/day using Pro Tools don’t seem to be coming to an end just yet, and I certainly welcome comments from everyone.  Thanks, AF

Mastering at The Farm

Saturday, April 11th, 2009

I’ve been mastering records I’ve mixed for a number of years now.  The first record I mastered was Born On by the Portland, OR band Time Farmer.  bornonBy the time I was done mixing this one, I felt like we were so close to having the exact sound I wanted that I thought it would be worth mastering this one myself.  Everyone was happy, and to this day it’s one of my favorite sounding records I’ve worked on.  The next one I mastered was Golden Dragon by the Philly band Downtown Harvest.  Same thing here – we were very happy with the sound, so I went for it – again, another favorite.  And on I went, slowly taking up mastering on my own while carefully observing all the great mastering engineers I’ve worked with, like Jeff Lipton at Peerless Mastering in BostonNathan James at The Vault here in NYC and Nick Blagona at Metalworks in Toronto.

More recently, I have begun to take on clients for whom I am only mastering. It was only after a number of years mastering records I had mixed that I felt I was ready to take this step, as the experience has allowed me to study mastering more, gather some critical tools, and to develop a method that gets me the results that I and my clients are looking for.  At this point I’m not only happy to be offering mastering, I’m totally enjoying it! I think one of the most rewarding things about mastering is that I know we are making the final decisions about the record – this is what is going out into the world.

cutting-lathe-copy

A cutting lathe. This is why the call it "cutting a record."

In the past, mixers and mastering engineers were completely different animals.  The job of the mastering engineer was to take a tape and  transform it into a master disc from which the vinyl releases would be manufactured.  This required the use of a lathe, a specialized machine that cut the master.  It’s no wonder that mastering was its own field.  Today, however, we are more often than not going from digital files to digital files.  For better or worse, anyone with basic audio software and a disc burner can make a master.  Of course, this doesn’t mean that anyone with the capability of making a master has the capability of making a good sounding master, but it does mean that more experienced engineers can begin to take on the role of mastering using much of the gear that they already own.

So, my methods for mastering will vary according to what the project seems to require, but in general I am mastering out of Pro Tools HD, sending out to hardware with the hedd_192productCranesong HEDD 192 converter, often hitting my API 2500 compressorph1_2500_m when appropriate, and using a few key plugins within Pro Tools, including the Sonnox Inflator, the PSP Neon Linear Phase EQ and the Massey 2007 Mastering Limiter.  I’m learning that the API 2500 can be a very neutral box, with such a low ratio as 1.5:1 and ultra fast release times, just getting those needles to bob every so slightly allows the box to add a coherance and punch to mixes without imparting too much of that sound.  The HEDD’s tape and tube emulation has proven indespensible, especially when needing to add warmth and depth to crispy digital mixes.

One thing that I seem to do a bit differently is that I am really relying upon the addition of harmonics to achieve apparent loudness and excitement.  As when I mix, I try to take a layered and cascading approach to adding harmonic richness.  Getting a little bit of harmonic complexity out of each stage in the chain can result in a very lively master that doesn’t sound squashed.  And I’m entirely committed to learning how to get the masters to really come alive without being overly concerned with the so-called “loudness wars.”  I aim to get the masteres “up there” but to retain enough dynamic range that they are stll engaging and don’t tire out the ears.  For me, adding harmonic complexity seems to be the key to achieving these results.

Finally, one of the most imporant additions to my studio for mastering is the new Antelope Isochrone OCXV master clock. ocxv It’s hard to explain how key this piece of kit is to feeling as if I can truly make the best calls regarding producing a final product.  Both the ability to hear into the music in order to make the best choices about processing and the overall increased accuracy in the digital stream that becomes the masters themselves are essential to my work at this point.  It’s my humble opinion that the Antelope clocks are going to start finding their way into a majority of mastering studios.

So, there we have it: I’m officially out of the closet as a mastering engineer!

Sarah Tolar Album Release

Friday, April 10th, 2009

tolarcoverOn April 13th at The Canal Room in Manhattan, Sarah Tolar will release her first album, Big Blue Moon. I recorded the vocals and mixed this record, and David Cook produced. Sarah’s music is some of the most honest, straight-up songwriting you’ll hear, and her vocal performances range from deeply soulful blues to gentle ballads to funky and playful grooves. Check out Sara’s site, and come out to the release party.